TL;DR: Across 317,000+ queries, multi-million-token conversations, indirect prompt-injection attacks, and sandboxed coding/SQL trajectories on ten peer-reviewed public benchmarks, krusch-stack achieves: (1) state-of-the-art cost-accuracy routing across all three major routing suites (0.7883 / 80.72% accuracy at $0.2117/1K in official RouteWorks/RouterArena GitHub CI PR #169, pending merge; #1 lowest Pareto distance 0.4269 at -83.95% cost on ACL 2026 LLMRouterBench; and #1 In-Distribution Micro AIQ = 0.7488 / 0.7695 with -72.63% cost at 98% GPT-4 quality plus #1 Leave-One-Suite-Out OOD AIQ = 0.7268 / 0.7455 across 72,980 rows on Martian RouterBench); (2) 0.00% Targeted Attack Success Rate (0/949, down from 19.28% unprotected) across all 1,046 episodes of ETH SpyLab AgentDojo v1.2.2 with 0.00 pp benign utility loss (61.86% Policy-Floor / 69.07% Spotlighting); (3) #1 10-task Macro NDCG@10 = 56.40% (73.88% Recall@10) across all 2,389,123 docs and 162,216 queries of ACL 2025 CoIR alongside strong open-weights retrieval on ICLR 2026 BEAM (100K–10M, 2,000/2,000 probes), RepoBench-R (47,998 Qs), and LegalBench-RAG (6,889 Qs); and (4) large deterministic $0-API harness lifts on open-weights openai/gpt-oss-120b across Aider Polyglot (19.56% → 51.56% Pass@2, 2.64x), BIRD-SQL Mini-Dev (26.00% → 40.20% EX, 1.55x, 100% valid SQL across 500/500 queries), and UC Berkeley BFCL v3 Live (59.88% → 66.28% Micro, 84.69% Irrelevance, -80.67% schema tokens across 2,251/2,251 queries). Scope qualifiers matter: frontier multi-turn reasoning models still hold the 75%–88%+ coding and 65%–75%+ multi-candidate SQL ceilings, and self-judged cloud memory stacks lead aggregate BEAM E2E QA. All 21 raw logs and deterministic verifiers are public on Hugging Face.
0.7883 · 0.7695
#1 RouterArena CI, #1 ACL LLMRouterBench (0.4269) & #1 Martian RouterBench AIQ
0.00% ASR · 56.40%
AgentDojo 1,046-Ep Defense (from 19.28%) & #1 ACL 2025 CoIR 10-Task NDCG@10
51.56% · 40.20% EX
2.64x Aider Polyglot Pass@2 & 1.55x BIRD-SQL Self-Heal on Open-Weights 120B
68 / 68 Gates
Loopback Air-Gap, Proxy/AST Oracle Traps & 21 SHA-256 Raw Audit Logs

1. Condensed 6-Pillar External Scorecard (10 Suites)

Rather than inventing custom micro-benchmarks or grading models with themselves, we ran each subsystem of krusch-stack against ten established academic and industry benchmarks inside an isolated 96 GB NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (sm_120) clean-room VM and local 1024d snowflake-arctic-embed2 loopback (zero outbound cloud API calls on every open-weights run).

Pillar & Repo External Benchmark & Scale Verified Sovereign Result External Stack / Leaderboard Context
Cascade Router
krusch-cascade-router
RouterArena (8,400 Qs + 420 rob.)
ACL 2026 LLMRouterBench (12,566 Qs × 13 LLMs)
Martian RouterBench (36,497 0-shot + 36,483 5-shot × 11 LLMs)
0.7883 RouterArena CI (80.72% Acc @ $0.2117/1K)
0.4269 #1 Pareto (-83.95% cost, 1.27ms)
0.7488 / 0.7695 #1 ID AIQ (-72.63% @ 98% GPT-4) & 0.7268 / 0.7455 #1 OOD AIQ
-48.0% TTFT live SSE · 51.67% Pass@2
Tops Paix2 (0.7763), KT-ModelRouter (0.7628), vLLM-SR (0.7486), Azure-Model-Router (0.7042), Martian ($4.83/1K), NotDiamond ($4.10/1K), RouteLLM (25.25% vs. 8.75% unseen ARC-AGI) & KNN/SVM/MLP/ZeroRouter across ID + Leave-One-Suite-Out OOD.
Working Memory
krusch-context-mcp (v2.0.0)
ICLR 2026 BEAM
100 chats (~178.34M tok), 2,000/2,000 probes across 100K, 500K, 1M, 10M in ~8K budget
92.58% (100K) & 93.00% (10M IE) recall
0% E2E drop 100K → 1M (70.60% → 72.86%)
92.50% / 98.13% 100K CR (Stock / QLoRA)
Beats pure dense 8K across all 4/4 splits; beats cloud past.dev (gpt-5.6-luna) on Contradiction Resolution (4/4 splits), 10M IE (70.00% vs. 68.75%) & 10M MSR (29.54% / 38.33% vs. 28.17%); trails cloud on overall E2E (see §3).
Code AST & Git
krusch-git (v1.2.3)
ACL 2025 CoIR (10/10 Tasks) (2,389,123 docs, 162,216 Qs)
RepoBench-R (ICLR 2024) (47,998 Py & Java Qs across 8 splits; 0 LLM judges)
56.40% #1 CoIR Macro NDCG@10 (73.88% R@10, 50.94% MRR@10)
19.12% RepoBench Macro Acc@1 · 68.58% Acc@5 (31.33% Py / 27.45% Java cfr Easy)
+7.42 pp NDCG@10 over CoIR BM25 (48.98%) & exceeds all 10 published CoIR Table 3 512-tok baselines incl. Voyage-Code-002 (56.26%) & E5-Mistral 7B (55.18%; see §3); +21.8% Acc@1 over pure dense on RepoBench-R, beating CodeBERT & UniXcoder.
Evidentiary Span RAG
KruschNexus (v0.2.6)
LegalBench-RAG
714 docs, 6,889 full / 776 mini character-exact span queries (0 LLM judges)
26.74% Full Macro F1 (k=1)
25.81% F1 / 44.72% R (k=2) · 47.71% R@6
33.95% MAUD Recall@2
2.29x (+128.5%) Macro F1 over fixed 160-tok dense chunks (11.70%) using the same embedder; MAUD Recall@2 (33.95%) beats published OpenAI text-embedding-3-large + Cohere Rerank Recall@64 (28.28%).
2PC Code & SQL Harness
krusch-coding-harness
Aider Polyglot (225/225) (6 languages, un-skipped tests)
BIRD-SQL Mini-Dev (500/500) (11 SQLite DBs; 0 LLM judges)
Polyglot: 19.56% → 51.56% Pass@2 (72 healed)
BIRD-SQL: 26.00% → 40.20% EX (35.75% R-VES, 100.00% valid SQL, 13 healed)
2.64x (+32.00 pp) coding lift tying cloud Claude 3.5 Sonnet (51.6%) & beating GPT-4o (23.1%) + 1.55x (+14.20 pp) SQL lift (5.00x on toxicology, 50.00% moderate) at $0 API cost; trails multi-turn frontier reasoning (see §3).
MCP Hub & Security Shield
krusch-stack
ETH SpyLab AgentDojo (v1.2.2) (1,046 eps: 97 benign + 949 attacks)
UC Berkeley BFCL v3 Live (2,251/2,251 across all 6/6 splits in 64-tool hub)
AgentDojo: 19.28% → 0.00% ASR (0/949), 61.86% / 69.07% Benign (83 floor blocks)
BFCL v3: 59.88% → 66.28% Micro, 84.69% Irrel., -80.67% schema tok
Eliminates all 183 indirect prompt-injection compromises on raw gpt-oss:120b (57.14% slack, 52.78% banking) with 0.00 pp benign loss; cuts 64-tool MCP schema tokens from 7,894 → 1,526 tok/turn while lifting abstention +17.46 pp & healing 29 schema calls.

2. How the Stack Compares Against Three Architecture Archetypes

A. vs. Standard Open-Source "Wrapper" Stacks

Typical open-source agent stacks glue LangChain or LlamaIndex splitters (fixed 500-token windows) to a single vector store, stuff every MCP tool schema into the system prompt, pass raw untrusted tool outputs straight back into the model, and allow coding or SQL agents to execute unverified 1-shot generations. Our controlled ablations isolate why each of those defaults breaks at scale:

B. vs. Commercial Cloud Router, Memory, Code & Legal Stacks

C. Clean-Room Auditability vs. Unverified Leaderboard Claims

Every run in our benchmark archive passes 68 / 68 automated integrity gates: (1) loopback air-gap verification (127.0.0.1:11434, cloud API keys unset), (2) runtime JavaScript Proxy traps, opaque RPC session tokens, and Python pre-eval column stripping on ground-truth answer/SQL/qrel/injection fields that block oracle access before inference, (3) RestrictedUnpickler + SafeZipExtractor guards, read-only DatabaseSync SQL enforcement, full-corpus 2,389,123-doc anti-shrinkage checks, and zero hardcoded attacker literals on AgentDojo, (4) mandatory Exercism test un-skipping + pristine test SHA-256 checks, and (5) zero LLM self-judging (deterministic compiler, SQL set-equivalence, AST bijection, and math verifiers on 9 benchmarks; dual cross-family open-weights referees on BEAM).

3. Where Frontier Cloud Stacks Still Beat Us (Honest Gaps & Open PRs)

Why We Leave the Caveats In: Open-weights systems engineering is strongest when its boundaries are explicit. Below are the exact areas where frontier cloud models still hold a clear margin, where benchmark protocol differences or artifacts matter, and which upstream leaderboard pull requests remain pending merge.

4. Raw Artifacts & 60-Second Cryptographic Verification

Every raw per-query JSON audit log (21 files, SHA-256 pinned) and 13 Hugging Face Dataset Viewer splits (35 files / 350.90 MiB) are published under CC-BY-4.0 at krush420/sovereign-g4-benchmarks, alongside the interactive Pareto & trajectory explorer at krush420/sovereign-router-arena and repository-level reproduction docs in kruschdev/krusch-stack.

# Clone the raw clean-room audit logs & verify all SHA-256 digests in <60s
git clone https://huggingface.co/datasets/krush420/sovereign-g4-benchmarks
cd sovereign-g4-benchmarks

python3 -c '
import hashlib, json, pathlib
rows = [json.loads(l) for l in pathlib.Path("data/scorecard_summary.jsonl").read_text().splitlines()]
for r in rows:
    if r["audit_log_file"].startswith("raw_audit_logs/"):
        digest = hashlib.sha256(pathlib.Path(r["audit_log_file"]).read_bytes()).hexdigest()
        assert digest == r["audit_log_sha256"], f"Mismatch: {r[\"audit_log_file\"]}"
        print("VERIFIED:", r["audit_log_file"], digest[:16])
'

Inspect the Raw Logs or Install KruschStack Locally

npx krusch-stack init --defer-tools · 68/68 SHA-256 Clean-Room Gates · MIT Licensed

🤗 HF Raw Audit Logs → GitHub: krusch-stack → 2026 Architecture Blueprint →